In addition the new legislation gives all employees the right to "request to work" beyond the retirement age set by the company. This will not affect the age at which people can claim their state pension. The legislation provides a national default retirement age of 65, which means that complusory retirement under the age of 65 will be deemed unlawful unless the employer is able to objectively justify the early retirement.
This extra protection for more mature workers includes the opportunity to enforce the legislation by way of an employment tribunal and therefore upper age limits in respect of claims for unfair dismissal and redundancy were removed from 1st October.
What are we doing at CDL to adhere to the regulations?
Well, we do not include dates of birth or age indicators on CV's which are sent to our clients and in fact have not done so for some time. Neither do we list qualifications with dates of study. We do not advertise positions with age limits and do not discriminate in any way on the basis of age during the process of obtaining applications, considering CV's and in obtaining interviews and work placements for those candidates who are registered with us.
We short list candidates on the basis of whether their qualifications and experience meet with our client's specification. We also look for a consistent work history and no regular "job hopping" without good reason and that salary expectations are consistent with the salary band for the position under consideration.
Phrases like 'applicants should be 25-35 years of age', ‘young graduates’, ‘mature person’ are discriminatory.
We strive to publicise our vacancies in ways most likely to attract people of a variety of ages, including internet and legal publications. We should stress that we have always had a policy of equal opportunities for our candidates and where firms we work with are found to have contrary policies, we discontinue our association with them. That said, reassuringly, we are beginning to see clients confirming their equal ops' policies and checking our policy in this respect.
It appears that despite the impending enforcement date for the anti-age discrimination rules, law firms and in-house are widely continuing to categorise their positions in relation to post qualifying experience and whilst this might be seen as disadvantaging younger Solicitors, it has been a method of narrowing the search for suitably experienced people for the level of role available.
However, we always take account of the experience our candidate has, rather than a cursory glance at their PQE and would always introduce a candidate whom we consider to have had the relevant experience and exposure to enable them to fulfil the client's requirements. We consider the quality and relevance of experience to be the most important factor - not the number of years of PQE. We know that experience can vary considerably; simply as a result of the type of firm, infrastructure, amount of delegation/responsibility and quality of work dealt with.
We do keep details of date of birth for our records but this information is retained in order to enable us to undertake diversity monitoring.
We work to good practice and have a written Equal Opportunities Policy, which all or staff adhere to and benefit from. We strive for a workforce which is age diverse and to place candidates in firms on the same basis. We seek applications for vacancies from all age groups. We strive to ensure that the vacancies we advertise are objective, being based solely on skills, relevant experience and capacity to do the job.
We hope that you do not need to rely on the legislation in the future but it is certainly worth knowing your rights and encouraging employers, agencies and others to be open minded and non-discriminatory in respect of age. With an ageing population, employers will have serious recruitment problems in the future if they do discriminate.


